About 80 countries, nearly half of those participating in the recent climate talks, called for a specific plan to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. In contrast, oil-producing nations such as Saudi Arabia argued against singling out fossil fuels. Several countries, particularly in Africa and Asia, emphasized that developed nations, particularly Western countries like the United States, have historically benefited from fossil fuel consumption and should bear the responsibility of aiding poorer nations in transitioning to alternative energy sources.
Notably, the United States did not send a formal delegation to the discussions, a first in three decades. This absence carried significant implications, especially as a White House spokesperson expressed that the current administration sees value in fossil fuel development, citing actions and policies established under President Trump.
The situation highlights a complex dynamic: numerous countries remain economically dependent on fossil fuels, while others, lacking adequate incentives, resist transitioning away from them. The U.S. stance also indicates a preference for continuing fossil fuel usage over investing in renewable energy.
Consequently, the final agreement at COP30 did not explicitly mention fossil fuels. Instead, it included a vague commitment for leaders to consider prior decisions made in Dubai and acknowledged the ongoing, irreversible transition toward low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development.
Despite this statement of intent, questions arise regarding the feasibility of creating a concrete plan to address fossil fuel reliance and drive meaningful change on the global stage.
Source: https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/11/27/1128443/climate-talks-fossil-fuels/