Dozens of hereditary peers, including high-profile figures such as the Duke of Wellington, have come under scrutiny for their opposition to Labour’s proposals aimed at improving workers’ rights. Recently, the House of Lords supported amendments to the employment rights bill, proposed by Conservative members, for the third consecutive time. This legislative move seeks to counter Labour’s commitment to establish guaranteed hours contracts and provide immediate protections against unfair dismissal.
Among those opposing Labour’s plans were 47 hereditary peers, along with 93 barons, 16 earls, and seven viscounts. Notably, the ninth Duke of Wellington, Charles Wellesley, participated in this effort. His lineage traces back to the first duke, Arthur Wellesley, who played a key role at the Battle of Waterloo in 1815.
Criticism of the Lords’ actions has emerged from trade union leaders and Labour representatives. Paul Nowak, General Secretary of the TUC, called the actions of unelected peers “out of touch” with the current needs of workers. Labour MP Justin Madders expressed concern about their influence in obstructing policies meant to enhance job security.
The government plans to reject the Lords’ amendments, although some ministers have voiced apprehensions about the potential economic repercussions and job losses associated with the proposed changes. A Labour representative noted that the amendments did not align with the party’s electoral mandate, highlighting an unwritten convention in the Lords against voting against such important measures.
Throughout this process, industry leaders have intensified lobbying efforts against the changes, citing concerns that they may affect employment levels and economic stability. Prominent business figures, from Karren Brady to other notable CEOs, participated in the vote against Labour’s proposals. Calls have emerged from various sectors for Labour to reconsider the initiative, particularly in light of potential negative implications for businesses. A government spokesperson reaffirmed the administration’s commitment to delivering the employment rights bill, which is projected to benefit over 15 million workers in the UK.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/nov/18/out-of-touch-peers-criticised-for-voting-against-workers-rights