Nathan Calvin, a lawyer involved in technology policy at Encode AI, recently reported that he received a subpoena from OpenAI delivered by a sheriff’s deputy. Calvin stated that this subpoena targeted both him personally and his organization, requesting access to his private communications with California legislators, college students, and former OpenAI employees.
In response to inquiries, OpenAI referred to comments made by their chief strategy officer, Aaron Kwon. Kwon explained that the subpoenas were intended to gather context about Encode AI’s involvement in legal challenges against OpenAI, particularly those backed by Elon Musk to prevent OpenAI from transitioning into a for-profit entity. Kwon noted that it is not unusual for law enforcement officers to serve legal documents as part of their duties.
Joshua Achiam, OpenAI’s head of mission alignment, responded to Calvin’s post, expressing concern over the implications of such actions for the company’s public image and mission. Achiam emphasized the importance of maintaining a virtuous reputation and highlighted the organization’s responsibility toward humanity.
Additionally, Tyler Johnston, founder of the AI watchdog group The Midas Project, reported receiving similar subpoenas from OpenAI. His organization was asked for a comprehensive list of all individuals and entities they have engaged with regarding OpenAI’s restructuring.
This situation raises questions about the extent to which companies might use legal means to address criticisms and the potential implications for discourse around AI regulation.
Source: https://www.theverge.com/news/798523/openai-ai-regulation-advocates-subpoenas-police