I’ve seen reshuffles from the inside, and I know why Starmer won’t sack Rachel Reeves – even though he should | Simon Hart

I’ve seen reshuffles from the inside, and I know why Starmer won’t sack Rachel Reeves – even though he should | Simon Hart

Last week saw a government reshuffle that appeared hurried and driven by recent events rather than a planned strategy. Angela Rayner was removed from her position, raising questions regarding the implications for Prime Minister Keir Starmer, particularly given his prior focus on a narrative around anti-corruption. This reshuffle underscores the inherent challenges leaders face when reorganizing their teams, often resulting in discontent among party members.

Historically, reshuffles have created more dissent than harmony, even when they are deliberate. The decisions to replace Ian Murray and Lucy Powell seemed to have contributed to feelings of unease within the party rather than reinforcing unity. Additionally, moving Yvette Cooper from her role as home secretary to the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has led to speculation about the effectiveness of this change.

In light of recent events, questions arise about whether Starmer will consider firing Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor. While Reeves has been described as underperforming in public appearances, her removal could destabilize the government’s economic narrative. Starmer’s affinity for fiscal responsibility raises further doubt about the feasibility of such a move, even if it appears necessary to some within the party.

Despite a large parliamentary majority, Labour’s internal dynamics reveal tensions around appointments, often leading to disappointment across various factions. The broader public view on reshuffles is typically one of indifference, with many seeing only a changing of personnel instead of any substantive shift.

Chancellors play a unique role, influencing both government strategy and market perception. Changing a Chancellor can provoke significant reactions among investors. Given these factors, it seems unlikely that Starmer will act against Reeves despite any internal pressures, as this would counteract the economic stability he aims to project. The paradox remains that while there is pressure to act boldly, the most impactful decision may be the one he opts against making.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/sep/09/reshuffle-keir-starmer-rachel-reeves-weakest-link

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top