Recent discussions involving Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin, captured by a hot mic, have raised questions about longevity research and its societal implications. The concept of extended lifespans has garnered attention since 2017, prompting some to explore potential future scenarios in literature, such as the speculative novel “Who Wants to Live Forever.” This book narrates the story of a couple, Yuki and Sam, as they navigate their relationship amid the introduction of a drug called Yareta, which claims to extend human life by 200 years. The narrative is set in 2039, reflecting the dramatic changes that could ensue in society.
Current investments in longevity by billionaires like Peter Thiel and Jeff Bezos highlight the accelerating pace of these developments. This rapid advancement raises concerns about the equitable distribution of longevity technologies. As suggested by sci-fi writer William Gibson, the future may arrive unevenly, exacerbating existing societal disparities. The potential for authoritarian figures to extend their lives while their regimes contribute to global conflicts further complicates the discussion. Leaders involved in longevity research might prioritize personal benefits without considering broader societal consequences.
The disparity in access to life-extending drugs could lead to significant societal shifts. The wealthiest individuals, who are statistically older white men, may monopolize longevity, impacting opportunities for younger generations. Issues of healthy life expectancy have already revealed gaps based on socioeconomic status, and the introduction of drugs such as Yareta may deepen these inequities and create a new class of workers performing the risky jobs that privilege individuals might avoid.
The societal dynamics involved in long-lasting relationships also warrant examination. As individuals live longer, traditional structures, such as marriage, might evolve, with practices like renewing vows every seven years emerging. Overall, the discussions surrounding longevity and its implications continue to challenge assumptions about life, society, and the future.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/sep/13/autocrat-tech-live-for-ever-vladimir-putin-xi-jinping