The em dash, a long punctuation mark (—), is increasingly prevalent in AI-generated writing. This stylistic choice has raised questions about its use and appropriateness, particularly within various forms of communication. The em dash can substitute for commas, colons, or parentheses, potentially altering the tone and pacing of text. In some instances, AI tools have been noted for their overreliance on this punctuation, leading to perceptions of text being overly formal or lacking authentic voice.
Many writers who employ AI for drafting often receive content rich in em dashes, even when specifically requesting their removal. This can result in communications sounding more robotic and less like the individual’s authentic voice. The suggestion to enhance AI use includes keeping a human element in the drafting process, ensuring the initial drafts capture the writer’s original tone and intent.
To maintain a more human quality, writers should prioritize a first draft produced by themselves, allowing AI to assist in later revisions. After initial adjustments by AI, further editing should involve removing excessive em dashes and rephrasing to ensure the message aligns closely with natural speech patterns. This approach aids in preserving the unique voice of the communicator while benefiting from the tool’s capabilities.
AI is recognized as a valuable collaborator rather than a replacement for human creativity. When used judiciously, it can improve clarity, structure, and engagement in writing. However, it is crucial for users to stay vigilant in maintaining their individual style and authenticity in written communications, particularly in informal or personal contexts.
Source: https://venturebeat.com/ai/busted-by-the-em-dash-ais-favorite-punctuation-mark-and-how-its-blowing-your-cover/