Concerns over Europe’s reliance on U.S. technology have intensified recently, especially regarding cloud computing. Major American companies, specifically Google, Microsoft, and Amazon, control approximately 70% of Europe’s cloud infrastructure. This dependence raises questions about potential scenarios where a U.S. leader might restrict access to these services, particularly if diplomatic relations deteriorate.
Experts highlight that such a move could disrupt critical services, including healthcare systems. Robin Berjon, a digital governance specialist, emphasizes the importance of considering the implications of a potential “kill switch” scenario, suggesting it could have severe consequences for data access and service functionality.
In response, U.S. companies assert that they provide “sovereign” cloud solutions designed to protect EU clients’ data, reassuring stakeholders about their operational continuity. There is a growing recognition of the need for Europe to enhance its digital sovereignty, especially following incidents where European officials have been impacted by U.S. sanctions.
However, European firms currently represent only a small portion of the cloud market. While organizations like OVHCloud in France and T-Systems in Germany are available, their capacity and range of services do not match those offered by U.S. tech giants. Open-source alternatives exist, but perceived concerns around their efficacy and security hinder widespread adoption.
Despite this, some European states are beginning to take steps toward greater digital independence, such as Schleswig-Holstein’s transition away from Microsoft products. Experts believe that while a complete shift away from U.S. technology is challenging, it is feasible over time.
Discussions around digital sovereignty are becoming more pressing in Europe, with calls for regulatory measures to foster local technology adoption. The path forward may involve strategic focus on sectors where Europe can strengthen its competitive edge, while caution remains warranted regarding geopolitical tensions that could disrupt access to essential technology.
Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3dpr2zkny0o?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss