Labour’s clean energy plan needs a revamp: get real on costs and ignore the artificial deadline | Nils Pratley

Labour’s clean energy plan needs a revamp: get real on costs and ignore the artificial deadline | Nils Pratley

Ed Miliband, the energy security secretary, stated in a recent BBC interview that reducing energy bills by £300 is a priority for the government, reflecting a pre-election commitment to lower energy costs by 2030. The challenge seems to involve chancellor Rachel Reeves, who may face the option of transferring some of the cost burden to general taxation. Miliband suggested that the upcoming budget could consider eliminating the 5% VAT on energy bills, a move that could result in a £2.5 billion cost to the government.

Experts from leading energy companies recently presented to a Commons select committee, indicating that even if wholesale energy prices decrease, retail electricity costs could remain 20% higher due to ongoing non-commodity expenses. These expenses include costs related to energy transmission and infrastructure upgrades. Rachel Fletcher, from Octopus Energy, highlighted that these costs are adding approximately £300 annually to household energy bills.

The analysis provided by these energy executives raised concerns about the current strategy for transitioning to cleaner energy. They criticized the lack of budgetary control and questioned the necessity of certain infrastructure investments given the decline in electricity demand since 2019. Acknowledging the historical underinvestment in the UK’s energy infrastructure, Miliband noted that the goal of achieving a largely decarbonized power system by 2030 may not lead to the anticipated reductions in bills unless fundamental challenges, including high fossil fuel prices, are addressed.

Suggestions for future strategies include reassessing the aggressive timelines for renewable energy deployment, particularly in offshore wind, to potentially lower costs. The government’s commitment to certain price guarantees for renewable energy, currently set at £113 per megawatt hour, is also under scrutiny, with calls for a more cost-effective approach. The discussions emphasize the need for a balanced examination of costs and the implications of hastily implementing extensive renewable initiatives without addressing underlying financial challenges.

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/business/nils-pratley-on-finance/2025/oct/20/labour-clean-energy-plan-needs-a-revamp-get-real-on-costs-ignore-artificial-deadline

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top