Donald Trump’s recent visit to Israel and Egypt followed a ceasefire and hostage exchange deal involving Hamas. During speeches in Jerusalem and Sharm el-Sheikh, Trump presented the negotiations as a significant achievement, asserting, “All I’ve done all my life is deals.” His role is acknowledged as pivotal in securing the terms of the ceasefire after pushing for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s agreement to conditions he had previously rejected. However, it is crucial to note that the agreement is primarily for a ceasefire and a prisoner exchange, and does not constitute a peace agreement or the initiation of a peace process.
The negotiation framework outlined in Trump’s 20-point plan proposes that the Gaza Strip be demilitarized and governed by a Palestinian committee, overseen by a Board of Peace chaired by Trump. Yet, significant details still require resolution, and observers question whether sufficient political will exists on either side to foster a lasting peace.
Reports indicate that the ceasefire could be fragile, as indicated by the rapid emergence of tensions. For example, critiques have surfaced regarding Hamas’s slow return of deceased hostages, leading to discontent in Israel, where officials have threatened to cut aid to Gaza if obligations are unmet. Meanwhile, Hamas is reportedly reasserting control within Gaza, demonstrating armed presence and engaging in violence against perceived collaborators.
Despite Trump’s assertions that the conflict might be resolved, ongoing military engagement—specifically, Israeli Defense Forces activity—continues to spur violence. The effectiveness of any International Stabilisation Force, as projected in the Trump plan, hinges on a reliable ceasefire. Observers suggest that unless fundamental issues are addressed, the underlying conflicts may persist, challenging the premise that peace can be achieved merely through presidential declarations.
Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce86118q6ego?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss